Yet whatever those views, his patent concern with language has made his
work suspect among those concerned with ‘material conditions’ and the like.
Indeed, some would argue that he can only be viewed as an idealist, as
someone operating at the level of the superstructure.
Wittgenstein’s work is simply too abstract, too far removed from the everyday practice of geography to make a difference.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment